Australia: No extraterritorial operation of Australian patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: No extraterritorial operation of Australian patents

Australian courts have recently adopted a restrictive reading of the extra territorial operation of Australian patents.

In Load and Move Pty Ltd v Container Rotation Systems Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 843, the plaintiff owned a patent directed to a container rotation system. It sued the defendants, alleging infringement of the patent. The infringement allegation was peculiar. It alleged the defendants had contracted for the foreign manufacture in China of a container rotation system which was to be supplied to Eritrea. Thus the system was never going to enter the Australian territory, even though the supply was being orchestrated from Australia.

The judge refused to grant preliminary discovery and to entertain an infringement finding. As the contract for manufacture and sale was to be performed totally outside the jurisdiction, there was no exploitation of the patent for the purposes of infringement.

The case points to a restrictive reading by the Australian judiciary of the territorial operation of Australian patents. Given the rapid development of internet-type sales channels, this is perhaps unfortunate, as it may allow the effective exploitation of patent rights by Australian entities, provided that exploitation occurs wholly outside the country.

Peter Treloar


Shelston IP

Level 21, 60 Margaret Street

Sydney NSW 2000, Australia

Tel: +61 2 9777 1111

Fax: +61 2 9241 4666

email@shelstonip.com

www.shelstonip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

An Australian top court decision clarifying honest concurrent use and wins by publishers against AI platforms were also among the top talking points
AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has seemingly committed to hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Azhar Sadique and Kane Ridley, who founded the London office in 2023, are now both working in legal tech and AI-related roles, while another UK-based lawyer has also left
Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
Gift this article