Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Argentina: Intellectual property and franchise agreements

Several sections related to IP-related matters in the Argentine New Civil and Commercial Code are among the regulations that govern agreements, and among those agreements it is the franchise agreement that has the largest amount of regulations of interest in terms of intellectual property.

In that respect, Section 1512 sets forth that the franchisor needs to be the exclusive holder of the rights in the trade marks, patents, commercial names and copyrights or needs to have the right to confer to the franchisee the right of use and transmission under the terms of these types of contracts.

The object of the franchise agreement is represented by the authorisation in favour of the franchisee to use a proven good-or-service-commercialisation system.

The license of the referred industrial or intellectual property rights is directly associated with the essential aim of the franchise agreement, which consists of cloning or copying the franchisor's company, including a complete outer identification of the franchise with the corporate image of such franchisor's company.

In addition to the immaterial or intangible, or even material, goods that constitute the object of the franchise agreement, there is also the provision of a body of technical knowledge and constant technical and commercial assistance – as established by the above mentioned section 1512 – which along with the above-mentioned elements makes it possible to commercialise goods or services by using the franchisor's proven system.

Daniel R Zuccherino


Obligado & CiaParaguay 610, 17th FloorC1057AAH, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaTel: +54 11 4114 1100Fax: +54 11 4311 5675admin@obligado.com.arwww.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article