Indonesia: Recordation of IP licence agreement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Recordation of IP licence agreement

Indonesian IP laws have always required IP rights licences in Indonesia to be recorded at the Intellectual Property Office. This requirement is set out on the Copyright Law, Patent Law, Trade Mark Law, Industrial Design Law, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits Law and Trade Secrets Law. However, such recordal mechanism has not been carried out due to the lack of implementing regulation, even though the legal consequence is that, if an IP licence is not recorded, it would not be binding on any third parties.

To implement that requirement, the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (MoLHR) recently enacted MoLHR Regulation No 8 of 2016 on Requirements and Procedures for Recordal of IP Licence Agreements, which stipulates the procedural steps to record an IP licence.

According to Regulation 8/2016, requests for recordation of an IP licence can be submitted to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) manually or online. However, the website of the DGIP does not yet provide a facility to implement this. Therefore, for now requests for recordation need to be submitted to the DGIP by hand.

To support a request for recordation of an IP licence, an application would need to submit (1) a copy of the licence agreement, (2) a copy of the certificate of registration of the IP rights, (3) an original power of attorney, and (4) an original payment receipt. The applicant is also required to submit a statement confirming that the licensed IP rights are valid, and that the licence would not jeopardise the national economy, hinder technological development or contravene the prevailing laws.

The DGIP will then examine the request for recordation of the IP licence and record the IP licence within 10 days after it receives the request. The DGIP will publish the recorded IP licence on the website of DGIP. A recordation of an IP licence is valid for five years and is renewable.

With the issuance of the implementing regulation, it is now necessary for the licensor or licensee to record their IP licence at the DGIP, to ensure that the use of the IP rights in Indonesia based on the licence agreement is protected.

Lukiantono_Daru
Utami_GayatriPutri

Daru Lukiantono

Gayatri Putri Utami


Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & PartnersThe Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II, 21st FloorSudirman Central Business DistrictJl. Jendral Sudirman Kav 52-53Jakarta 12190, IndonesiaTel: +62 21 2960 8888Fax: +62 21 2960 8999www.hhp.co.id

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article