Scandinavia: Harmonisation of validation formalities in 2015

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: Harmonisation of validation formalities in 2015

2015 was the year when Scandinavia took two major steps towards full harmonisation of validation formalities in Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway regarding translation requirements and payment of fixed fees rather than fees depending on the number of pages of a validated patent.

Re translation requirements, the major event was, of course, that the London Agreement entered into force for Norway on January 1 2015, meaning that, from then on, only the claims are to be translated into Norwegian for European patents granted after that date.

Another step re translation requirements took effect on April 1 2015 for Denmark and Norway and harmonised all the Scandinavian countries: if the language of proceedings of the European patent is English, only the translated parts are to be filed. If it is German or French, the specification is to be translated into English or the relevant national language and is to be filed along with the national-language translation of the claims.

Re fixed fees, Norway and Denmark introduced, on April 1 2015, fixed fees for validations, meaning that the fee payable no longer depends on the number of pages filed. Sweden led the way in this respect already when joining the London Agreement in 2008 and introduced a fixed publication fee covering a basic fee for publication of translation.

However, full harmonisation of fixed fees is still missing on one point: in Sweden the fixed fee applies only to the first eight pages, and a fee for publication of each started page of the application beyond the first eight pages remains.

The harmonisation of translation requirements and fixed fees provides two substantial advantages to European patent owners. It is now much easier to use one entry into Scandinavia and much less expensive to validate in Scandinavia.

Larsen_Ina-Bjerre-100

Ina Bjerre Larsen


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article