US patent litigation back with a bang in May and June

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US patent litigation back with a bang in May and June

The latest US patent case filing figures from Lex Machina show a sharp increase in May and June, making filing in the second quarter of this year the highest ever observed

lex20machina20june20patent20litigation.jpg

Lex Machina has released data on patent case filings in the US that may raise a few eyebrows. It reports that filings rose sharply in May, with 607 cases, and even further in June, with 654 cases. This made the second quarter’s overall figures of 1,656 cases filed the highest of any quarter yet observed, said Lex Machina. This was despite April’s figure of 395 cases filed being the lowest of the year so far.

The total for the first half is 3,122 cases filed, making 2015 on course to see more than 6,000 cases by the end of the year.

Lex Machina said in a blog post: “As a whole, the filing rates of 2015 appears to be more like those of 2013. The rise in June, however, is unexpected, as previous years tended to dip down from spring towards summer.”

This tallies with figures released earlier this month by Unified Patents, which revealed an 11.1% increase in US district court filing in the first half of 2015. The company said 2015 is on course to see the highest number of patent litigation cases filed ever.

Lex Machina also noted some trends between the difference districts. The first half has seen a trend towards more patent cases being filed in the Eastern District of Texas, with a 166% increase in the first half of 2015 over the second half of 2014. In contrast, the District of Delaware’s proportional share of the cases has continued to decline from the second half of 2014 by more than a third.

The busiest plaintiffs in June this year include Oberalis (50 cases), Genaville (25 cases) and Broadqast Solutions LLC (22 cases), all of which filed in the Eastern District of Texas.

The figures will no doubt increase calls for patent reform. But supporters of patent legislation may be disappointed. The House of Representatives reportedly today removed the Innovation Act from the House floor consideration this summer. This means that any hope of patent reform has been put on ice until at least August.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article