The petitioners, patent owners and law firms topping the PTAB rankings

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

The petitioners, patent owners and law firms topping the PTAB rankings

With filings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board suggesting another strong year, Managing IP has analysed the leading players at the PTAB and also included a PTAB category in our IP Stars rankings for the first time

aia20petitions20as20of20feb205.jpg

The early indications from 2015 point towards nothing stopping the momentum behind the increasingly popular PTAB proceedings.

The USPTO’s latest figures reveal that 115 PTAB petitions were filed in January this year, 100 of which were IPRs. While the IPR figure was down on the 177 filed in December, it was up greatly on the 60 filed in January last year.

And February already looks set to blow last year’s figure out of the water. Some 60 IPR petitions had already been filed this month by the end of February 9, putting it ahead of the 54 IPRs filed in all of February 2014.

In addition, the Federal Circuit ultimately decided to implicitly endorse current PTAB practices at the end of January in its first opinion on an IPR appeal. Its in Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies decision affirmed the PTAB’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.

Observers concluded that the Federal Circuit had approved the basic framework for conducting PTAB proceedings, although a strongly worded dissent from Judge Pauline Newman did provide some pointers for future battle grounds over PTAB proceedings. The decision will provide certainty for PTAB practitioners.

In addition, the institution and invalidation rates – while down from the “death-squad” days of 2013 –are still high enough that the PTAB is by far the best shot for someone looking to get a patent invalidated.

Managing IP recently analysed which petitioners, patent owners and law firms were most active in 2014. Apple was the most-active challenger of patents, Zond was the most-targeted patent owner, and Fish & Richardson was the law firm involved in the most proceedings. You can see the full data of the most-active players at the PTAB in 2014 here (non-subscribers will have to take a trial to the website to view).

Aside from crunching the numbers to see which companies did the best in terms of volume, Managing IP also recently included PTAB firm rankings for the first time in our IP Stars guide to the leading IP firms and lawyers, which has just been published online.

You can access the 2015 IP Stars rankings here. To view the United States rankings, choose “United States” from the “Americas” drop down menu. You can then view the PTAB rankings by either scrolling down the page or choosing “PTAB litigation (USPTO)” from the “All practice areas” drop-down menu.

Don't forget: you can keep up with all of Managing IP's PTAB coverage on our dedicated topic page at www.managingip.com/ptab 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Gift this article