Three views from in-house counsel on managing innovation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Three views from in-house counsel on managing innovation

AIPPP_lunch_Embraer

Diverse perspectives on the challenges of managing innovation in an increasingly politicised climate were provided by in-house counsel from 3M, Canon and Embraer at a lunchtime discussion at the AIPPI Congress



AIPPI lunch panel

Dean Harts of 3M said that his company recently received its 100,000th patent, while Kenichi Nagasawa said Canon had some 860 people working in IP worldwide. By contrast, said Wander Stange Menchik, Embraer has only been dealing with IP since 2006 and has an in-house team of just four people.

“Our competitors are much larger and have a stronger IP tradition. We’re still learning,” he said, speaking in Portuguese. He said his priorities are to ensure that IP assets are protected appropriately, to get the highest value out of the assets while also checking the company is not infringing others’ rights, and to structure the assets in the best possible way – something that is becoming more of a challenge: “The fiscal incentive law in Brazil is being reviewed and that could be a major obstacle if you invest in Brazil.”

AIPPI Embraer

On the positive side, there are few competitors and not much litigation in the aviation industry. But Embraer faces challenges arising from open innovation and cooperation: the company has more than 200 contracts with partners all over the world, including with universities and research institutes. Managing the IP rights and open innovation in that context can present difficulties.

Nagasawa faces somewhat different problems, which include the exponential growth in patents; the threat from patent assertion entities; 3D printing enabling manufacture at home; and what he called the “IP crossover” of different rights. He traced the evolution of an industry such as cameras from mechanical to electronic to IT-based technology, with the latter bringing additional features such as WiFi and GPS. Progression to each stage is accompanied by “a great increase in the number of patents embedded in a single product,” said Nagasawa.

Harts said that 3M is active in 200 countries, and two-thirds of its sales are outside the US; he compared his experience of patent and trade secrets disputes in Germany, Japan, the US and Korea. “The US is the most expensive jurisdiction for patent enforcement – but also the most expensive for defendants,” he commented.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article