France: Two measures to improve access to patent system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Two measures to improve access to patent system

In order to facilitate access for small business entities and startups to the patent protection of their inventions, the French Patent Office recently presented a draft of an amendment to the French Patent Law introducing a provisional patent application (PPA) and a 10-year utility patent.

The utility certificate is an industrial property title analogous to a patent of invention (same patentability criteria) but limited to a six-year duration, granted without any search report but linked to a specific filing date. When suing for infringement one request the establishment of a search report.

Note that that any patent or utility certificate may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility certificate application.

The minimum requirements for filing a PPA would be to have a clear description and drawings. There will be no need to draft claims. The applicant would have a 12-month period to convert the PPA into a patent or a utility patent application.

Figure 1: The present situation is illustrated

Source: FPO


Figure 2: The proposed future situation is shown

Source: FPO


The utility patent applicant would have the possibility to convert it into a patent application.

The grant of a utility patent could still be obtained without the establishment of a search report. Again, in such a scheme, any patent or utility patent may claim the priority of a previous French patent or utility patent application.

These proposals have been submitted by the French Patent Office for comments and should become more mature in the near future.

The introduction of the PPA and of the utility patent would allow applicants to elaborate a more sophisticated strategy of protection in line with the applicant's strategy, but would also introduce more complexity and entail certain risks especially concerning the quality of the definition of patented inventions and the existence of patent titles granted without any search report.

Kohn_Philippe-100

Philippe Kohn


GEVERS41, avenue de FriedlandParis 75008, FranceTel: +33 1 45 00 48 48Fax: +33 1 40 67 95 67paris@gevers.euwww.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article