The parody primer

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The parody primer

Parody will be the subject of what promises to be an entertaining session today. Moderator Camila Santamaría tackled some questions about it.

What is your interest in the topic of parody and why did you decide to moderate this session?

I think parody is a fascinating topic because—besides the fact that it is very interesting from an academic point of view, given its intrinsic versatility, both from a case law perspective and from a jurisdictional viewpoint—parody is dynamic and current, due to new technologies and trends… plus, it is literally very entertaining!

Why do you think it is an important issue for trademark practitioners now?

I think parody is a very important issue for trademark practitioners since parodies usually occur with protected IP rights—and frequently very well-known IP rights. The issue is that there is a very thin line between what is considered fair use and what is deemed as an infringement, and many don’t know this, even trademark practitioners. At any point the trademarks that we protect may be subject to this frequent practice, so we must know about it … besides, in our daily life we are more exposed to parodical practices than we think!

Do you think the law on this issue varies much between jurisdictions and if so is that a problem?

Unlike what happens with many aspects related to trademarks—whose standards are more or less consistent worldwide—the conception and thus, the protection of parody does vary among jurisdictions, and one of the reasons for this is based on precedent (this is even applicable in; many civil law countries). More than a problem, I see this as a challenge and an eventual wakeup call to trademark practitioners, because they need to be updated with the current legal standpoints in their jurisdiction(s) of interest, to be able to effectively protect their own or their clients’ trademarks, or on the other hand, to avoid committing trademark and/ or copyright infringements.

What will the speakers be covering during this panel? Are there any particular cases or examples you will discuss?

The speakers will mention several parody cases in different jurisdictions, evidencing the multifaceted nature of parody and its many spectrums of protection. It will be very amusing.

CM20 What is Parody? takes place from 11:45 am to 1:00 pm today.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article