The parody primer

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The parody primer

Parody will be the subject of what promises to be an entertaining session today. Moderator Camila Santamaría tackled some questions about it.

What is your interest in the topic of parody and why did you decide to moderate this session?

I think parody is a fascinating topic because—besides the fact that it is very interesting from an academic point of view, given its intrinsic versatility, both from a case law perspective and from a jurisdictional viewpoint—parody is dynamic and current, due to new technologies and trends… plus, it is literally very entertaining!

Why do you think it is an important issue for trademark practitioners now?

I think parody is a very important issue for trademark practitioners since parodies usually occur with protected IP rights—and frequently very well-known IP rights. The issue is that there is a very thin line between what is considered fair use and what is deemed as an infringement, and many don’t know this, even trademark practitioners. At any point the trademarks that we protect may be subject to this frequent practice, so we must know about it … besides, in our daily life we are more exposed to parodical practices than we think!

Do you think the law on this issue varies much between jurisdictions and if so is that a problem?

Unlike what happens with many aspects related to trademarks—whose standards are more or less consistent worldwide—the conception and thus, the protection of parody does vary among jurisdictions, and one of the reasons for this is based on precedent (this is even applicable in; many civil law countries). More than a problem, I see this as a challenge and an eventual wakeup call to trademark practitioners, because they need to be updated with the current legal standpoints in their jurisdiction(s) of interest, to be able to effectively protect their own or their clients’ trademarks, or on the other hand, to avoid committing trademark and/ or copyright infringements.

What will the speakers be covering during this panel? Are there any particular cases or examples you will discuss?

The speakers will mention several parody cases in different jurisdictions, evidencing the multifaceted nature of parody and its many spectrums of protection. It will be very amusing.

CM20 What is Parody? takes place from 11:45 am to 1:00 pm today.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article