Managing IP EMEA Awards 2019 winners revealed

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP EMEA Awards 2019 winners revealed

Managing IP Awards image.png

The Managing IP Europe, Middle East and Africa Awards 2019 were held on March 7 at the Royal Lancaster in London, and we can now publish the winners here

Managing IP hosted the EMEA Awards 2019 in front of nearly 400 people at the Royal Lancaster, on what was a fantastic evening to honour the best IP achievements by law firms and in-house counsel last year. 

You can find all of the winners below. You can also see the shortlist of winners here

We will also publish the list of winners in our May/June publication later this year, and all the photos from the evening will be available on our Facebook page.

Now we look to Hong Kong, where we will host the Asia Awards 2019 on March 20, followed by the Americas Awards 2019 in New York on April 4. You can find more details about those ceremonies here.

Congratulations to all the winning firms in EMEA this year!


NATIONAL AWARDS

AUSTRIA Contentious: Geistwert

AUSTRIA Prosecution: Puchberger & Partner

BELGIUM Patent Contentious: Hoyng Rokh Monegier

BELGIUM Patent Prosecution: De Clercq & Partners

BELGIUM Trade Mark Contentious: Altius

BELGIUM Copyright/Design: Van Innis & Delarue

DENMARK Patent Contentious: Plesner

DENMARK Patent Prosecution: Inspicos

DENMARK Trade Mark Contentious: Bech-Bruun

DENMARK Trade Mark Prosecution (Patent & Trade Mark Attorney Firms): Zacco

DENMARK Trade Mark Prosecution (Law Firms): Plesner

DENMARK Copyright: Løje Arnesen & Meedom

FINLAND Contentious: Borenius

FINLAND Prosecution: Kolster

FRANCE Patent Contentious: Bird & Bird

FRANCE Patent Prosecution: Santarelli

FRANCE Trade Mark Contentious: Armengaud Guerlain

FRANCE Trade Mark Prosecution: Cabinet Plasseraud

FRANCE Copyright: Cabinet Artlaw

FRANCE Boutique Firm of the Year: Hoyng Rokh Monegier Véron

GERMANY Patent Contentious (Law Firms): Hogan Lovells

GERMANY Patent Contentious (Patent Attorney Firms): Hoffmann Eitle

GERMANY Patent Prosecution: Maiwald

GERMANY Trade Mark (Law Firms): Harmsen Utescher

GERMANY Trade Mark (Patent & Trade Mark Attorney Firms): Vossius & Partner

GERMANY Copyright/Design: Bardehle Pagenberg

HUNGARY Firm of the Year: Danubia

IRELAND Patent Contentious: Whitney Moore

IRELAND Trade Mark Contentious: Mason Hayes & Curran

IRELAND Copyright: Mason Hayes & Curran

IRELAND Patent Prosecution: Hanna Moore & Curley

IRELAND Trade Mark Prosecution: Tomkins

ISRAEL Patent Contentious: Liad Whatstein & Co

ISRAEL Patent Prosecution: Luthi + Webb

ISRAEL Trade Mark Contentious: S Horowitz & Co

ISRAEL Trade Mark Prosecution: Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz

ISRAEL IP Transactions: Herzog Fox & Neeman

ITALY Patent Contentious: Trevisan & Cuonzo

ITALY Patent Prosecution: Studio Torta

ITALY Trade Mark Contentious: Jacobacci & Associati

ITALY Trade Mark Prosecution: GLP

ITALY Copyright/Design: Dentons

NETHERLANDS Patent Contentious: Hoyng Rokh Monegier

NETHERLANDS Patent Prosecution: VO

NETHERLANDS Trade Mark Contentious: Hofhuis Alkema Groen

NETHERLANDS Copyright/Design: Brinkhof

NORWAY Contentious: BAHR

NORWAY Prosecution: Onsagers

POLAND Contentious: Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak

POLAND Prosecution: JWP

PORTUGAL Patent Contentious: VdA

PORTUGAL Trade Mark Contentious: Garrigues

PORTUGAL Prosecution: Simões Garcia Corte-Real & Associados

ROMANIA Contentious: Zamfirescu Racoti & Partners

ROMANIA Prosecution: Cabinet M Oproiu

RUSSIA Patent Contentious: Hogan Lovells

RUSSIA Trade Mark Contentious: Baker McKenzie

RUSSIA Prosecution: Gorodissky & Partners

SOUTH AFRICA Firm of the Year: Spoor & Fisher

SOUTH AFRICA IP Transactions: Webber Wentzel

SPAIN Patent Contentious: Clifford Chance

SPAIN Patent Prosecution: ZBM Patents & Trademarks

SPAIN Trade Mark Contentious: Grau & Angulo

SPAIN Trade Mark Prosecution: BomhardIP

SWEDEN Patent Contentious: Sandart & Partners

SWEDEN Patent Prosecution: AWA

SWEDEN Trade Mark Contentious: Vinge

SWEDEN Trade Mark Prosecution: Groth & Co

SWEDEN Copyright: Bird & Bird

SWITZERLAND Patent Contentious: Meyerlustenberger Lachenal

SWITZERLAND Trade Mark: Weinmann Zimmerli

SWITZERLAND IP Transactions: Homburger

TURKEY Firm of the Year: Gün + Partners

UKRAINE Firm of the Year: Doubinsky & Osharova

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Firm of the Year: Rouse

UNITED KINGDOM (ENGLAND & WALES)

Patent Contentious (Law Firms): Powell Gilbert

Patent Contentious (Patent Attorney & Trade Mark Attorney Firms): EIP

Patent Prosecution: Carpmaels & Ransford

Trade Mark Contentious: Bristows

Trade Mark Prosecution (Patent & Trade Mark Attorney Firms): Barker Brettell

Trade Mark Prosecution (Law Firms): Fieldfisher

Copyright: Wiggin

Designs: Gowling WLG

IP Transactions: Slaughter and May

IP Set: 8 New Square

IP Barrister of the Year: Adrian Speck QC

SCOTLAND

Patent Contentious: Burness Paull

Trade Mark Contentious: Brodies

Copyright: Burness Paull

Prosecution: HGF

IP Transactions: Brodies

REGIONAL AWARDS

AFRICA Firm of the Year: Spoor & Fisher

BALTIC/EASTERN EUROPE Firm of the Year: Ellex

BENELUX Boutique Firm of the Year: Calysta

BENELUX Trade Mark (Patent & Trade Mark Attorney Firms): Chiever

BENELUX Trade Mark (Law Firms): Hofhuis Alkema Groen

EUROPE Patent Contentious: Allen & Overy

EUROPE Patent Prosecution: Hoffmann Eitle

EUROPE Trade Mark (Law Firms): Taylor Wessing

EUROPE Copyright: Bird & Bird

EUROPE IP Transactions: Linklaters

EUROPE Firm to Watch: Westerberg & Partners (Sweden)

SCANDINAVIA Firm of the Year: Zacco

MIDDLE EAST Contentious: Al Tamimi & Company

MIDDLE EAST Prosecution: Abu-Ghazaleh Intellectual Property

MIDDLE EAST Firm to Watch: Gowling WLG

SPECIAL AWARDS

ESTONIA: TRINITI for SNB-REACT v Deepak Mehta

BELGIUM: Altius for Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd v Duma Forklifts

FINLAND: LakiMajakka Oy for Finnish Prosecution Service v A and B

FRANCE: Allen & Overy for Novartis v Teva

GERMANY

Hogan Lovells for DOCERAM v CeramTec

Unverzagt von Have for Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff

Bardehle Pagenberg for Nintendo v Bigben

Allen & Overy for Pfizer Ireland v Orifarm

Taylor Wessing for Scotch Whisky Association v Michael Klotz

NETHERLANDS

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek for Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV

Hofhuis Alkema Groen for Christian Louboutin SAS v Van Haren Schoenen

UNITED KINGDOM

Simkins for BBC v MCPS and PRS

Reed Smith for Cartier International v BT

Wiggin for Easygroup Ltd v Easy Fly Express Ltd & Anor

Pinsent Masons, Taylor Wessing and Mishcon de Reya for Teva v Gilead

Powell Gilbert and Taylor Wessing for Warner Lambert v Generics UK

IN-HOUSE IP TEAM AWARDS

Europe In-House Patent Team of the Year: Syngenta

Europe In-House Trade Mark Team of the Year: Mondelēz International

Global In-House Patent Team of the Year: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sapna Palla, who joins the firm from A&O Shearman, said she was impressed by its work with major life sciences businesses
The court’s decision will have brands and their advisers ‘desperately reviewing’ portfolios and filing strategies, sources predict
Simona Lavagnini discusses the Greek classics, Rudyard Kipling's 'If', and how she dreams of beautiful words
Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin’s merger won’t be the last transatlantic tie-up if recent history is anything to go by
Betty Chen reveals litigation opportunities and provides an update on plans to double the firm's headcount in San Francisco
David Parrish expects AI to be among the major talking points for a newly formed committee aimed at protecting the interests of London-based IP practitioners, firms, and their clients
The court, which revealed that the parties had settled their dispute, also upheld findings of infringement
Wu Xiaoping of Wanhuida Intellectual Property says the methodology often applied in assessing inventiveness in pharmaceutical patent litigation cases is set to be used in re-examination and invalidation proceedings after the CNIPA makes an invalidation decision a quasi-precedent
Exclusive data and in-house analysis show that law firms should work smarter, not harder, to ensure their communication has greater impact on clients
The tie-up, which will create a firm with a combined revenue of around $2bn, will add around 10 US-based partners to Herbert Smith Freehills’s IP offering
Gift this article