Auto counsel give tips on IP department integration

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Auto counsel give tips on IP department integration

adobestock-174950452.jpg

At this year’s Autolex forum, IP counsel at Honda, Uber, Bosch and AGC Automotive revealed how they add the most value within their businesses

With the advancement and use of technologies such as 5G and artificial intelligence, intellectual property is becoming more important to automotive companies – and it’s vital, therefore, that IP departments take a more central and integrated role in their businesses.

At Managing IP’s Autolex forum last week, in-house counsel revealed that the best way to achieve that integration is to treat the legal and IP departments as customer service functions.

“Firstand foremost, the legal department really is a customer service function that’s there to service the business,” said Chris Storm, legal director of emerging technologies at Uber in Pennsylvania. “I’m a big believer in that if you provide good experience and customer service to the rest of the teams in your company, that’s how you get repeat customers.”

He added that being a good customer service function can be challenging at Uber because the businesses hires from many different industries, and each one has a different expectation of how legal should engage and be involved.

“It is very different hiring from automotive or aerospace than it is from tech and app development,” he said. “You’ve got some clients who want legal to get out of the way, want to launch products quickly and are not used to that kind of oversight, and some who are used to legal being more involved.

“How do you create a tailored service for these different teams to give them the level of support they need but also the level of support they expect? It’s a balancing act.”

Business enablers

Daniel Warsh, legal counsel at Bosch in Detroit, added his perspective. He argued that attorneys are risk communicators – but that this function can give lawyers a bad reputation if it’s not balanced with a drive to find solutions too.

“People might think that we’re a cost and not adding value, and that we’re really just there to spoil the fun,” he said.

“We have to understand what our clients and customers are looking for. They’re not looking for us to tell them that they can’t do something – they’re looking for solutions and for us to come to them and offer alternative solutions when a particular course of action might not be viable.”

He added that it’s important for legal and IP departments to shed the mentality of being ‘no people’, and start proactively finding ways to convince their non-legal colleagues that they’re there to help them do business in a compliant and legal way.

That mindset change can be spurred by the department’s physical proximity to the business’s engineers. Mark Duell, senior corporate counsel for Honda in Ohio, pointed out that his firm has demonstrated a commitment to IP by creating a specialist unit that is separate and distinct from its legal department.

That unit is based in the research and development facility in North America, which gives it unparalleled access to the engineers.

“They can feel free to come to us with their IP issues directly,” he noted.

“That access that we have helps to make sure that we can get everything covered that we need to cover. You might not be able to put the whole legal department in the R&D facility, but you can certainly put your IP lawyers there because it’s really helpful.”

Reaching out

One panellist was keen to point out that while IP departments should act as a customer service function, that shouldn’t lead lawyers to sit around and wait for requests.

Eric Rogers, IP counsel and market strategy leader at AGC Automotive in Detroit, said: “All too often, legal departments can get a bit complacent and just act as a receiver department. They receive requests, turn the wheel, and then the output goes back to the group or customer that requested it.

“But that can be inefficient because you’re not so well connected to the business or the other groups you are serving. Perhaps you don’t know the background issues. So just because you’re a customer service function, don’t let that stop you from being an outreach agent.”

He added that counsel should work to understand what the business’s goals are and sit in on some of the departmental meetings, including product development, R&D and marketing, to help them really understand their colleagues’ day-to-day issues.

“That can help improve efficiency because you don’t have to take all that time and educate yourselves on every discreet issue.

“People might be hesitant to reach out if they know that when they send off a request to legal, they might get some feedback that misses some critical business points.

“As such, building those relationships can really help with the willingness of those groups to come to legal.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article