Being smart about global brand development

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Being smart about global brand development

In an increasingly globalized marketplace, companies need to learn to pick their battles and conserve their resources. That’s the message from yesterday’s panel, The Essentials of Managing a Worldwide Trademark Portfolio Companies.

Companies often instinctively feel the need to secure the maximum level of protection for all of their brands. However, Denise Yee of Visa International says that brand development requires a nuanced approach.

“At Visa, it seems like every client wants to name everything, all the time. And sometimes it makes sense, but a lot of times, for a particular service, it may not need a special name,” Yee explains.

Instead, she says that when discussing with partner companies about a new service, the first question is whether it needs a name at all. Several factors need to be considered, such as the product’s expected shelf life and whether there is will be significant marketing behind it. Other considerations include how many countries the product will be deployed in, whether the targeted audience is aimed at general consumers or other financial institutions.

Daniel Zohny of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) also stresses the need for a considered approach to brand protection. FIFA has its brands divided into several types, including the FIFA brand itself and the trophy.

There are also the event-related brands, such as logos, slogans and mascots for specific tournaments such as the 2014 FIFA World Cup. In this category, the size of the tournament also helps to determine the brand protection strategy. For example, while marks associated with the World Cup will be registered in many jurisdictions, for a smaller event such as an under-17 tournament, the brand protection will be focused on perhaps just on the host country.

Thomas Zutic of DLA Piper gave the outside counsel’s perspective. He says one of his main objectives to obtain strong protection for his client’s core trademarks.

“Many times, there will be tons of sub-brands, so you really got to make sure that you understand what is the core brand, what are the core marks and make sure that you are putting the appropriate resources behind that and not for something that’s just a one-time thing for three months,” he says.

In the end, building a brand is about careful weighing of a mark’s value. Even the Visa brand, judged by some to be the ninth most valuable in the world, does not indiscriminately register for the sake of getting a mark.

“We put a lot of thought into what we file, if we file at all.” Yee explains.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article