FTC announces investigation into patent trolls in the US

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FTC announces investigation into patent trolls in the US

edith-ramirez.jpg

Federal Trade Commission chairwoman Edith Ramirez announced that the FTC is launching an investigation into the potentially anti-competitive practices of patent trolls in the US

Ramirez made the announcement during a seminar on patent trolls and anti-competition law hosted in Washington DC by the Computer & Communications Industry Association and American Antitrust Institute.

The investigation is part of a coordinated crackdown on patent trolls by the Obama administration. It follows the announcement earlier this month of a White House plan to curb patent trolls, which will mainly be implemented through the USPTO. The plan was accompanied by a 17-page study by the National Economic Council and the Council of Economic Advisors and has been generally well-received by academics, industry and consumer advocate organisations.

Ramirez said the investigation will be held under Section 6b of the Federal Trade Commission Act, to “help develop a better understanding” of what she referred to as patent assertion entities (PAEs), which are popularly known as patent trolls.

She said that while the Commission still has “only snapshots of the cost of PAE activity”, early indications suggest that their benefits to innovation and the general public are greatly outweighed by their costs, which include shifting money away from research and development.

Between 2007 and 2012, the number of patent infringement lawsuits filed by trolls tripled, said Ramirez. Trolls now file the majority of patent infringement lawsuits in the US.

She said that PAE activity is also “changing shape”. Although IT is still the industry most targeted by trolls, data and anecdotal evidence collected by the FTC suggests that they now file half of all their lawsuits outside of the high tech sector.

Retailers are now the most common low tech sector targeted by trolls, and the FTC has had complaints from online retailers who have had to defend lawsuits against common features on their websites such as drop-down menus and shopping carts.

Small businesses have also increasingly become targets, with offline businesses such as coffee shops being sued for patent infringement for offering features like WiFi. Ramirez said the FTC plans to use Section 5 authority to protect small businesses against deceptive patent claims by trolls, such as attempting to secure settlements relating to expired patents or patents the troll has no rights to.

She said the Commission is also concerned about an increase in what she described as “hybrid PAE activity”, in which large corporations hide behind shell companies to engage in troll activities strategically targeting competitors.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article