Burberry loses check pattern mark in China

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Burberry loses check pattern mark in China

The China Trade Mark Office (CTMO) has cancelled Burberry’s trade mark on its signature tartan pattern the mark on non-use grounds

burberry.jpg

Burberry's Haymarket pattern

A Guangdong-based leather goods manufacturer Polo Santa Roberta (路必达马球皮具制品公司) filed the cancellation action, arguing that Burberry had not used its trade mark tartan pattern for three years. The CTMO sided with Polo Santa Roberta, which has been in disputes with Burberry in other jurisdictions around Asia, including Hong Kong and Taiwan. 

After the CTMO made its decision, Polo Santa Roberta held a press conference announcing the result and demanding Rmb 500 million ($82 million) in compensation based on loss of various business opportunities due to Burberry's enforcement. It also noted Burberry's continued legal actions against Polo Santa Roberta in Taiwan, and that courts there ruled in favour of Polo Santa Roberta in 2004, 2005, 2008 and 2009.

Burberry has filed an appeal with the Trademark Review and Appellate Board. In a statement, it stressed that the rights to the mark remain with the company while the matter is pending, and that the cancellation applies only to leather goods (class 18).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article