China revokes Gilead’s patent for key HIV drug

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China revokes Gilead’s patent for key HIV drug

SIPO’s Patent Reexamination Board has revoked Gilead’s patent for Viread following an opposition from domestic manufacturer Arisco

The Patent Reexamination Board found that Gilead’s application lacked novelty. Viread (tenofovir) was discovered in 1985 and is considered a front line drug for AIDS treatment.

China for many years has had provisions in its laws allowing for compulsory licences, though none have been issued. Last May, China issued its Measures for Compulsory Licensing of Patent Implementation, which brought about concerns that China would follow India’s lead in aggressively issuing such licences.

Though China has not yet handed out a compulsory licence, many believe that the government uses the provision to increase leverage in negotiations with drug companies. Last year, reports indicated that Gilead was concerned that Viread would be targeted and offered to make donations of the drug to head off the attempt.

A number of other jurisdictions have also taken steps to increase access to the drug. India and Brazil have rejected patents for tenofovir, while Indonesia took a compulsory licence for the drug. Gilead also licenses the patent to the Medicines Patent Pool in order to help increase access to the drug in certain developing economies.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article