Africa: Plant breeders’ rights in Tanzania

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Plant breeders’ rights in Tanzania

tanzania-plant-breeders-min-final.jpg

Tanzania is a United Republic comprising of Mainland Tanganyika and the island of Zanzibar. Although Tanganyika and Zanzibar are considered a United Republic, no unified Industrial Property Law has been enacted. Tanzania and Zanzibar thus had different laws for plant breeders' rights (PBRs), also known as plant variety protection. PBRs are a sui generis system of IP rights designed specifically to protect new varieties of plants.

PBR protection has been available on mainland Tanganyika since 2004, in terms of the Tanzanian (mainland) Plant Breeders' Rights Law (2002) (repealed Tanzania Act). This Law was replaced by the United Republic of Tanzania Plant Breeders' Rights Act (2012) (new Tanzania Act), which came into force on June 1 2013. PBR protection has more recently become available in Zanzibar on January 2 2015, by the enactment of the Zanzibar Plant Breeders' Rights Act (2014) (The Zanzibar Act). Prior to this date PBR protection was not available in Zanzibar.

It is interesting to note that the two acts mimic one another with the vast majority of the Zanzibar Act reading the same as that of the new Tanzania Act. Certain amendments made to the new Tanzania Act and the careful drafting of the Zanzibar Act allow the PBRs granted in either Tanzania or Zanzibar to be enforced in both territories. This paved the way for The United Republic of Tanzania accession to the 1991 Act of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV 1991) on October 22 2015, which was entered into force on November 22 2015.

The United Republic of Tanzania is among the 22 African countries that are members of UPOV, with Kenya recently acceding to UPOV 1991. Even more recently, Egypt has received approval from its cabinet to join UPOV.

mahomed.jpg

Waheed Mahomed


Spoor & Fisher Pretoria

Building No. 13 

Highgrove Office Park 

Oak Avenue 

Centurion 

Pretoria, 0157 

Republic of South Africa 

Tel: +27 12 676 1111

Fax: +27 12 676 1100 

info@spoor.co.uk

www.spoor.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The England and Wales appeals court handed down its judgment just seven working days after hearing the trademark dispute involving pharma company Merck
A host of law firms from across Europe and beyond helped bring the streaming technology dispute to a close
Hugues Derème, director general of the Benelux IP Office, unveils his vision for the region, how to improve IP awareness, and use of AI
A copyright win for AI firm Anthropic and a new executive order against law firm Jenner & Block were also among the top talking points this week
A principal at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner explains how AI tools, including DeepIP, can position the firm to help clients
The firm explains why AI-empowered data analytics could make it a more efficient advocate for its clients
Penelope Aspinall, of IP wellbeing charity Jonathan’s Voice, explains why managers should take a three-tiered approach to looking after workers’ mental health
Heath Hoglund talks about the value proposition of patent pools and why it went ahead with its first-ever series of pool meetings in China
Ryan Richardson, Chris O’Brien, and Jean Selep of Sterne Kessler analyse the treatment of SEPs at the UPC and ITC and highlight why SEP holders and implementers should be mindful of current developments in both forums
A ruling concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction, questions over costs transparency, and a missed deadline by Amazon were among the top talking points this fortnight
Gift this article