UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK: Increasing the PACE at the EPO

The results of the EPO's recently published Patent Filings Survey illustrate that the European patent is more popular than ever, with this upwards trend predicted to continue. A detailed study of the survey reveals that the strong growth in filings at the European Patent Office is driven by increased patent filing activity in both the UK and China, alongside a continued rise in other major territories.

Any increase in European patent filings is obviously associated with a concomitant increase in the workload of the EPO. As such, accelerating the prosecution of a patent application through the EPO is likely to become a more frequent client request.

In the case of Euro-PCT applications, accelerated examination under PACE may be requested at any time. However, for the request to be as effective as possible it should be made upon entry into the European phase, or together with any response to the WO-ISA, IPER or SISR required under Rule 161(1) EPC.

To further accelerate prosecution, an applicant may waive the right to a communication pursuant to Rule 161(1) or (2) and 162, pay any claims fees due and, where required, submit a response under Rule 161(1) upon entry into the European phase. Any request for accelerated examination at this time will encompass the formalities examination, the supplementary European search report and/or substantive examination as applicable.

It is important to note that accelerated examination of an application will cease if any request for an extension of time for response is made to the EPO. Additionally, accelerated examination may only be requested once per application, thus any re-entry into the accelerated examination procedure before the EPO is not possible.

Finally, accelerated examination will be suspended if any renewal fees due before the EPO are not paid before their initial due date. Here, any application may be returned to accelerated prosecution with the payment of the renewal fee within the six-month grace period.

Accelerated prosecution provides an excellent means of ensuring the timely prosecution of pending European patent applications. However, it is essential the intricacies of the system are fully understood to achieve the best results for attorneys and clients alike.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm, which appointed three IP partners from A&O Shearman, wants to develop a tier one practice in Europe
The England and Wales appeals court handed down its judgment just seven working days after hearing the trademark dispute involving pharma company Merck
A host of law firms from across Europe and beyond helped bring the streaming technology dispute to a close
Hugues Derème, director general of the Benelux IP Office, unveils his vision for the region, how to improve IP awareness, and use of AI
A copyright win for AI firm Anthropic and a new executive order against law firm Jenner & Block were also among the top talking points this week
A principal at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner explains how AI tools, including DeepIP, can position the firm to help clients
The firm explains why AI-empowered data analytics could make it a more efficient advocate for its clients
Penelope Aspinall, of IP wellbeing charity Jonathan’s Voice, explains why managers should take a three-tiered approach to looking after workers’ mental health
Heath Hoglund talks about the value proposition of patent pools and why it went ahead with its first-ever series of pool meetings in China
Ryan Richardson, Chris O’Brien, and Jean Selep of Sterne Kessler analyse the treatment of SEPs at the UPC and ITC and highlight why SEP holders and implementers should be mindful of current developments in both forums
Gift this article