Russia: Sweet Wi-Fi

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Sweet Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi is perhaps one of the most famous words in the modern world. It would seem it is an acronym which it is not. It is a nonsense word. Phil Belanger, a founding member of the Wi-Fi Alliance, explained that it does not mean anything at all. It just sounds like it means something. Aside from being nonsensical it is a trade mark and thus it acquires very much sense.

A Russian confectionery company FinTour filed a trade mark application number 2013706249 with priority of February 2 2013 in respect of goods in class 30 (food products). The examiner refused the registration arguing that the designation WiFi is a trade mark owned by WiFi Alliance and widely known by Russian consumers. As a result, registration of the said designation in the name of the applicant for the goods in Class 30 would be capable of misleading consumers with regard to the producer of the goods. Besides, the intention of the applicant to register the claimed invention as a trade mark may be regarded as contradicting the public interest because the use of commercial reputation of other persons cannot be regarded as fair behaviour on the market.

The applicant appealed the decision of the examiner and pointed out that the US company Wi-Fi Alliance has a registered trade mark in Russia Wi-Fi Direct according to certificate number 471498 in respect of goods in class 9 referring to computers and software (class 38).

It is obvious that the Russian confectioner FinTour is engaged in production and selling of confectionery products so that the consumer will not be misled with regard to the producers because each of the producers has a different stratum of consumers and those consumers have different preferences. The designation WiFi is a coined designation in regard to confectionery and cannot cause false associations in respect of the producer. Nor can the name of the confectionery products provoke false associations among consumers or contradict public interest, principles of humanity and morals, and it does not offend religious feelings. The applicant, according to him, cannot use the commercial reputation of another person because he is the first and the only producer of original confectionery products under the name WiFi on the Russian market and that designation was used by him even before the filing date of his trade mark application and earned high reputation over the years of his business in the field of confectionery production.

As a result, the Collegium of Patent Office was convinced by the applicant's arguments and decided in favour of the applicant. Finally, the Patent Office granted the registration of the trade mark WiFi for confectionery.

For the outside observer this decision is double edged. Arguments can be put forward on both sides. One of the arguments was that the consumers of the goods (computers and confectionery) are different. It is not clear why the Patent Office ruled out the situation in which a computer wizard clicks on the mouse of his computer and drinks coffee with candies to push sleep away.

Biriulin-Vladimir

Vladimir Biriulin


Gorodissky & PartnersRussia 129010, MoscowB. Spasskaya Str25, stroenie 3Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123pat@gorodissky.ru www.gorodissky.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article