France: Designs: is the liberalisation of French spare parts market imminent?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Designs: is the liberalisation of French spare parts market imminent?

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

The market for certain spare parts used for motor vehicle repair may be liberalised in France.

Today, Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 13 1998 on the legal protection of designs provides a status quo for these parts, in that member states can only change their national legislation in the direction of liberalisation, i.e. a lack of protection.

In France, the protection of automative parts as designs is open to any particular part that meets the legal conditions of designs protection, for a duration of 25 years. When the condition of being original is met, the parts can then also be protected by copyright for 70 years. This large protection was confirmed by the French Supreme Court (Cass. Crim. December 2 2003 n°02-88459).

A law still under discussion has added an exception to copyright monopoly so that when the component part is disclosed, its author cannot prohibit "the reproduction, use and marketing of parts intended to restore its original appearance to a motor vehicle or trailer...". This provision would come into effect on January 1 2020.

The protection by design is also amended to exclude "acts intended to restore its original appearance to a motor vehicle or trailer... for (a) parts relating to glazing, optics and mirrors; b) or made by the suppliers who manufactured the original part". It should be noted that the market for glazing and optics parts represents 30% of the spare parts market.

The protection period would also be reduced from 25 years to 10 years, while the entry into force would be January 1 2020 for parts under a) and January 1 2021 for parts under b).

Therefore, some aftermarket parts and all parts manufactured by suppliers who manufactured the original parts would be liberalised. This could constitute as much as 80% of a new vehicle.

However, there are still some obstacles: first, the use of the molds by the suppliers, and the removal of the car manufacturer's logo on the parts, which is still trademark infringement. There is also the question of access to technical information required to enable the repair.

On the other hand, Article 110 of the Community Design regulation (EC) No 6/2002, provides that protection, as a community design does not exist for a design that is a part of a complex product used to allow the repair of this complex product in order to restore its original appearance.

This only applies to replacement parts that are identical to the original part (ECJ, December 20, 2017 joined cases C 397/16 and C 435/1).

This ruling was recently applied by the Court of Appeal of Paris, on September 11 2018 against tuning parts.

marie.jpg

Aurélia Marie


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article