Navigation Menu

Other Services

Skip to Navigation menu Skip to top of page

PATENT

JULY / AUGUST 2008
  • How Quanta will change licensing

    The Supreme Court's decision in Quanta v LG could make it harder for licensors to collect downstream royalties. Eileen McDermott explores the implications

  • Politics, power and passion - this year's MIP 50

    With IP reforms being discussed around the world, this year's selection of the most influential people in IP features many politicians and campaigners. But there are also a few surprises

  • Avoid competition problems in China

    China's long-awaited Anti-Monopoly law comes into effect on August 1, but its impact on IP owners is far from certain, explain Kirstie Nicholson and Zirou Liu

  • Why privilege rules need to be reformed

    Attorney-client privilege is an increasingly contentious issue worldwide. Jochen Bühling and Michael Jewess introduce a series of jurisdiction-based Q&A articles

  • Litigation planning for licensors

    IP licensing is a key tool in any company's belt. But several recent Supreme Court decisions could make the process trickier, say Edward E Vassallo and Swatee Jasoria

  • How biotech patentees can navigate KSR

    Ewa M Davison and Gary M Myles provide strategies for establishing non-obviousness in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical arts in light of the Supreme Court’s rejection of a rigid TSM test

  • HP hit with $184 million jury award

    Hewlett-Packard was last month ordered by a jury to pay $184 million to Cornell University for patent infringement

  • Point of novelty test for design patents reviewed

    Judges focused on whether or not to maintain the point of novelty test for determining design patent infringement in last month's hearing in Egyptian Goddess v Swisa

  • Tech transfer leaders recognized

    Procter & Gamble, Max Planck Innovation and the Catholic University of Leuven have been recognized for their achievements in technology transfer

  • Peer-to-patent increases prior art submissions

    he USPTO's peer-to-patent project has led to an increase in prior art submissions but has failed to bring in fresh patent applications in its first year

  • Lipitor dispute settled

    Branded and generic drugs companies could be more willing to compromise on IP rights, following the Pfizer/Ranbaxy settlement over Lipitor

  • Letter from the editor

    1968 saw a social revolution in Paris. Forty years on, there is the potential for another memorable achievement in the city

JUNE 2008 MAY 2008
  • How to survive ITC litigation

    At a recent web seminar organized in conjunction with Finnegan Henderson, two private practitioners, an in-house lawyer and an attorney at the International Trade Commission explained how plaintiffs and defendants can navigate their way around the rules

  • Why India's patent battles matter

    Four pharmaceutical patent cases being argued in India will have a big impact on healthcare issues in the region. Peter Ollier looks at what is at stake

APRIL 2008 MARCH 2008 FEBRUARY 2008
  • Patent firms of the year

    This month Managing IP reveals the results of part one of the world's most detailed and authoritative survey of the IP market. Following five months' research, in this issue we list the leading firms in patent prosecution and contentious work in 65 jurisdictions

  • Survey results: Africa and Middle East

    Leading patent firms in Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, South Africa and UAE

  • Survey results: Americas

    Top-rated firms in Argentina, Brazil, the Caribbean, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and all the US categories

  • Survey results: Asia

    Firms ranked in tiers for Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, The Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam

  • Survey results: Europe

    Most highly rated firms in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and UK

  • Africa turns to IP for development

    The lack of IP protection in Africa deters investors, while inventors in the continent barely register internationally. But, asks James Nurton, is that about to change?

  • How Seagate has reshaped patent litigation practices

    The CAFC's decision In re Seagate reshaped the rules on wilful infringement and the use of opinions. Eileen McDermott asseses the impact so far

  • Asia's patent quality leaders

    The rate of patenting in Asian countries has increased dramatically over the past decade. But what about the quality? Peter Ollier considers the evidence

  • Adiós language woes, bonjour automatic translations?

    Rows about language regimes have stymied attempts to lower the cost of patenting in Europe. Emma Barraclough asks whether automatic translations could be the solution

  • Why patent life expectancy matters

    Peter Ollier looks at a range of statistics at the EPO, USPTO and JPO to see if patent renewal rates are decreasing and analyzes the implications

  • Fees may rise as EPO stresses quality

    Interview: Roland Grossenbacher, director of Switzerland's Federal Institute of Intellectual Property and chair of the EPO's Administrative Council talks about patents, EPO challenges and patent policy in Europe

  • Letter from the editor...

    Introducing this year's world IP survey

  • Court rules on non-essentiality of patents

    The UK High Court has made its first declaration of non-essentiality (DONE) in a patent dispute between two telecoms companies

  • UK loses leading patent judge

    Lord Justice Nicholas Pumfrey, a patent specialist judge in London, has died of a stroke

  • KSR cited as court backs $226.3 million award

    Biedermann Motech and its licensee DePuy Spine won a patent infringement case in one of the first decisions to apply the US Supreme Court's directives in KSR v Teleflex

  • Continuations rules promote the public interest

    The USPTO's new rules on claims and continuations will overwhelmingly benefit the public interest and should be supported, argues Daniel Ravicher

  • JPO bucks trend by cutting filing fees

    The Japan Patent Office says it will cut patent fees by an average of 12% and lower trade mark fees by 43% in the first half of this year

CURRENT ISSUE [go to Archive]

Current Issue CURRENT ISSUE:

July / August 2008


COVER STORY:
How Quanta will change licensing

The Supreme Court's decision in Quanta v LG could make it harder for licensors to collect downstream royalties. Eileen McDermott explores the implications