Africa: Trade mark and copyright developments in Africa

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Trade mark and copyright developments in Africa

In Nigeria there were two important trade mark judgments, both of which went in favour of foreign companies. In the case of Piaggio & CSPA v Autobahn Techniques and the Registrar of Trademarks (Federal High Court, Lagos, November 30 2017) the court made it clear that a Nigerian distributor cannot take the trade mark of its foreign principal. The judge sent this warning to Nigerian distributors: extensive promotion does not amount to 'acquisition of proprietorship and goodwill.'

The case of Toyota Motor Corporation v Subaya Metalware Nigeria and Registrar of Trademarks(Court of Appeal, Lagos, December 29 2017) is unusual. In this, the appeal court held that the mere filing of a trade mark application cannot be interpreted as use of a trade mark and, by extension, infringement of another registration. The court also came to the finding that car stereos are car parts and therefore fall in class 12 rather than class 9. This meant that certain class 9 registrations for trade marks incorporating the word Lexus were not infringed simply because the Lexus car has a detachable car stereo marked Lexus Premium System.

In South Africa, an interesting decision was made in The Philanthropic Collection (Pty) v Girls & Boys South Africa (Gauteng High Court, February 15 2017). This case dealt with copyright in databases. The judgment examines what level of contribution is necessary before a party can be considered a joint owner of copyright. The judge held that creating a single form that led to information being added to an existing database did not constitute the 'skill, judgment or labour' required to confer joint ownership.

The authorities in Malawi have published the Trademarks Bill 2017. When this bill becomes law the outdated goods only/Part A and Part B registration system will be replaced with a modern one that allows for the registration of 'non-visual signs' and trade marks used for services. There will also be protection for well-known marks, an infringement right that extends beyond the actual goods/services covered by the registration and 10 year registration/renewal terms. The bill anticipates Malawi signing the Madrid Protocol and seemingly puts an end to doubts about the validity of ARIPO registrations in Malawi.

Duncan Maguire

Chris Walters


Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000Fax: +44 1534 838001info@spoor.co.ukwww.spoor.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Clients will usually stick to trusted individual advisers, so it’s time for law firms to think of alternatives to non-competes if they feel compelled to sue ex-employees
Managing IP’s Asia-Pacific Practitioner of the Year, Karen Abraham, shares lessons from her 35-year career about how women lawyers can work their way up
Chad Landmon explains how he recruited a former life sciences litigation colleague to the firm and reveals one of the key clients that he brought over
The US Federal Circuit has vacated a district court decision denying Lenovo an anti-suit injunction and experts believe it has global implications
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Firms reveal how they help clients manage the costs of multi-patent lawsuits and what impact these disputes have on how companies assign work
A former Fish & Richardson attorney explains why his new firm’s offering led him to make his first-ever move
The case concerns whether the company’s subsidiaries paid Coca-Cola’s US parent company enough for the right to use its IP, including trademarks
Igor Simoes discusses how to juggle multiple projects and why individuals who create groundbreaking technologies inspire him
In the latest UPC update, we review the NanoString and iMop rulings, a big move in London and a decision on whether a patent pool administrator can intervene
Gift this article