En banc Federal Circuit reinstates $120m verdict in Apple v Samsung

October 10 2016

Show more sharing options

The Federal Circuit sitting en banc has reinstated a $120m damages verdict for Apple. Three judges dissented, saying en banc review should never have been granted

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Take a Free Trial or Login

Topics

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Patents

An electric citrus juicer with a compact design, placed on a plain white surface for a sharp presentation.

UPC update: Juicy Mannheim ruling | Cases tick past 750

A ruling concerning a juicing machine, a tussle over a preliminary injunction and a new judge in Paris were among the top talking points this fortnight

Max Walters, March 13 2025

Patents

Ex-Perkins Coie and Goldman Sachs lawyer named next USPTO chief

John Squires has had a range of in-house and private practice experience, most recently in the IP group at Dilworth Paxson

Max Walters, March 12 2025

Patents

Female hand with megaphone on white background

Weekly take: Counsel should speak out against Trump’s attacks on firms

President Donald Trump’s attacks on Perkins Coie and Covington & Burling should not go unchallenged

Rani Mehta, March 12 2025

Patents

Exclusive: Australia’s Foundry IP and Davis IP to join forces

The combined entity, which is expected to offer IP services across Australia and New Zealand, will be called Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis

Sukanya Sarkar, March 11 2025

Trademarks

Bird & Bird and Brandsmiths prepare for ‘double diamond’ battle

The Iconix v Dream Pairs dispute, to be heard at the UK Supreme Court, concerns trademarks owned by sports brand Umbro and the issue of post-sale confusion

Max Walters, March 11 2025

Trademarks