Asia's growth markets diverge in 2014 Global Innovation Index

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Asia's growth markets diverge in 2014 Global Innovation Index

The 2014 edition of the Global Innovation Index (GII) finds a relatively stable top table, while several developing and middle-income markets make big moves

For the fourth straight year, Switzerland tops the 2014 Global Innovation Index researched and published by Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO along with several partner organisations. The United Kingdom ranks as the most second most innovative country, while Sweden comes in third, the two swapping places from their 2013 spots. Finland and the Netherlands round out the top five, with the US coming in sixth.

In fact, the countries making up the top 10 are largely identical from 2013, with the exception of Luxembourg moving from the 12th to 9th, pushing Ireland from 10th to 11th. The list of countries making up the top 25 did not change at all, though there is some shuffling in position among those countries.

Innovation beyond inventions

The GII, now in its seventh edition, seeks to measure innovation by looking at various innovation inputs and outputs, with the two sides weighted equally. The inputs are divided into six categories: institutions, human capital and research, infrastructure, market sophistication and business sophistication. On the output side, the countries are evaluated on their knowledge and technology outputs and creative outputs. Some of the things measured here include IP-specific issues, such as patents filings and PCT filings per capita.

The GII also looks at the ratio between inputs and outputs and gives an efficiency score.

In a press conference earlier today in Australia introducing the report, the editors stressed that innovation is an open-ended concept that goes beyond just inventions or patent filings. For example, Bruno Lanvin of INSEAD pointed to Apple's push to sell music by single digital downloads as an innovation that was not an invention but nevertheless played a big role in changing how music is consumed.

Asia rising and falling

There is considerable movement in this year's rankings in the Asia Pacific region, with China (excluding Hong Kong, which is evaluated separately) moving up six spots to the 29th place. According to the data breakdown, China's improvement is based on a strong showing on several metrics, including education due in part to a strong showing on the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment programme (though the methodology has come under considerable criticism, especially when applied to China), continual growth of spending on R&D, the high number domestic patent applications (both invention and utility models) and a strong showing on various innovation output criterion.

India on the other hand fell 10 places to 76th. The report cites several areas where improvement is needed, including institutions (106th), human capital and research (96th) and business sophistication (93rd). India also saw considerable drops in several important innovation output categories, including knowledge and technology outputs and creative outputs. Education is cited as another area that poses a challenge, where a focus on a limited number of fields, growth centred on teaching rather than research and questions about the quality of the education in some institutions.

The full text of the report can be found here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Herbert Smith Freehills outline what rights owners should be doing ahead of sweeping changes to EU design law
Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
Gift this article