Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Advocate General backs libraries’ right to digitise

Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen, of the Court of Justice of the EU, argues that a member state may authorise libraries to digitise books without the consent of copyright holders

He gave his opinion today in a case concerning the EU Copyright Directive referred from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof. The dispute is between the Technische Universität Darmstadt and publisher Eugen Ulmer.

Eugen Ulmer sought to prevent the university from digitising a book in its library collection and to prevent users from being able to print the book or save it on a USB stick via electronic reading points.

In the opinion, the Advocate General says that member states may grant libraries the right to digitise books in their collections, if their being made available to the public by dedicated terminals requires it. This may be the case where works are old, fragile or rare or where they could be damaged by photocopying.

But he adds that this only applies to the digitisation of individual works, not a collection in its entirety.

Additionally, he says that the Copyright Directive does not allow users of terminals to save the works on a USB stick (as that would be the creation of a private digital copy). But the printing of a work from a terminal is comparable to making a photocopy, and may be covered by the private copying exception.

The opinion is not yet published in English, but is available in most other European languages. A press statement from the Court summarises it.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
Gift this article