Japan looks to provide protection for non-traditional marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan looks to provide protection for non-traditional marks

At yesterday’s users’ meeting, representatives from the Japan Patent Office (JPO) gave an update on recent activities and upcoming developments in Japanese trademark law. One of the biggest changes is that the country is looking to introduce protection for non-traditional marks.

One reason for this is the increasing popularity of these marks. In fact, the JPO notes that Japanese companies have been filing for and receiving nontraditional marks in other jurisdictions.

A draft version of a bill to amend the Japanese Trademark Act looks to provide for protection of color marks, sounds, moving marks, holograms, and positional marks. However, the draft bill does not provide for protection of scent and taste marks, due to concerns that it is too difficult to specify the scope of such marks and there is doubt that there is immediate need for them.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article