Battistelli: unitary patent fee concern is exaggerated

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Battistelli: unitary patent fee concern is exaggerated

Unitary patent fees will be confirmed “in 2014”, but it is impossible to be more precise than that, according to EPO President Benoît Battistelli. But he also claims that concern over fees is greatly exaggerated

Battistelli

Speaking to Managing IP in an interview at the IP Summit in Paris today, Battistelli (right) said: “People do not consider how constrained we are in setting fees. We have said that the unitary patent must be self-financing, on the one hand, but it must also be attractive to industry, on the other. The gap in between is pretty small.”

Although Battistelli would not be pushed more on what the fees will be, he said: “They will be higher than many would hope, but lower than some might fear.”

Preparation for the new work is going well, Battistelli said, with the EPO technically ready to start processing unitary patents today. “We are very relaxed about it. I don’t see the first patents being granted until the middle or end of 2015, so there is plenty of time. I don’t feel we need to set fees that soon either, given that timeframe.”

In response to questions about EPO labour protests during the recent 40th anniversary celebrations, Battistelli said: “It is a tradition at the EPO. We are an independent body that sets its own rules – and those rules have generally been quite conservative. Changes such as the recent addition of Chinese prior art can cause some problems. But I’m determined to introduce reforms to working practices when needed. It is that drive for efficiency that will be the biggest contributor to lower fees for IP owners.”

Battistelli spoke to Managing IP at the new three-day format of the IP Summit, in Paris. During a public presentation to attendees later, he said: “The experience of the EPO has shown that it is worth being both bold and optimistic. I hope we learn that lesson with the unitary patent.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of IPNote, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, has taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Practitioners warn that closing the Denver regional office could trigger a domino effect, threatening local innovation and access to IP resources
Gift this article