Megaupload judge steps down

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Megaupload judge steps down

David Harvey, the New Zealand judge overseeing the extradition of Kim Dotcom to the United States has recused himself from the case

Judge_David_Harvey

Kim Dotcom, one of Managing IP’s 50 most influential people in IP, is the founder of Megaupload, the cloud storage service shut down earlier this year by the US government. The United States has brought criminal copyright infringement charges against Dotcom and other company executives, claiming that they knowingly allowed and encouraged users to use the site for infringement. The US wants to extradite Dotcom from New Zealand, where he is domiciled.

According to the National Business Review, Judge Harvey was speaking at the NetHui conference in New Zealand. In a discussion about the effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement on IP issues such as DVD region locking, he reportedly said: “We have met the enemy, and he is the US”.

The Chief Judge of the district court, Jan-Marie Doogue, told the press that Judge Harvey stepped down of his own accord, “recognis(ing) that remarks made in the context of a paper he delivered on copyright law at a recent internet conference could reflect on his impartiality”.

Kim_Dotcom

The flamboyant Dotcom has been making headlines since persuading the New Zealand courts to relax the terms of his bail. He has announced that he will release a dance album to pay his legal fees, used Twitter to mock the charges levelled against him, and accused US Vice-President Joe Biden of personally ordering Megaupload’s shutdown.

To see Managing IP’s complete Top 50 list for 2012, click here.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article