ZTE and IBM discuss their international patent strategies

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ZTE and IBM discuss their international patent strategies

Patents are not only property rights; they are also a means of improving customer relations and breaking into new markets. That was the message from companies including ZTE and IBM at this week’s China-International IP Forum

Shen Jianfeng, director of the IP department at telecoms equipment provider ZTE, described his company’s multi-pronged approach to overseas patent portfolio management.

Patents are the tools we use to penetrate new markets, Shen explained. He stressed however, that ZTE carefully evaluates each potential market before deciding how and whether to develop its IP portfolio there.

We don’t have unlimited funds, so we have to be strategic in which countries we want to enter, he said.

Shen said that when looking at new markets, ZTE considers not only the level of competition there, but also the level of IP protection.

“We classify each country’s legal environment and level of protection as high, medium, and low,” said Shen, to determine what this means for each patent.

Not only do patents provide ZTE with the means to enter and compete in new markets, he said, they are also a stepping stone to ratifying the company’s reputation with customers.

As the company has become bigger, customers look at ZTE’s patent portfolio to evaluate whether it has the technical knowledge to deal with their problems, Shen explained. Having a strong overseas patent portfolio is a sign of the company’s capabilities.

Other rights owners agreed with the need for a selective and carefully considered IP strategy.

“You should not file all of your patents”, said Yang Xuri, IPR director for Peking University Founder Group. He pointed out that only 10% of his organisation’s IP portfolio is filed in the United States.

Companies need to not only understand the technical specifications of their patents, Yang said, but they also need to have a good sense of the commercialisation capabilities. If a piece of technology is not very good, he explained, then the rights owner should weigh the value of the technology against the cost of registering the patent.

Liu Xiaoyu, IP Manager for IBM, said she sees patents as an integral part of the company’s long-term strategy. She said that as one of the largest patent filers worldwide, IBM sees a number of advantages in having a broad patent portfolio.

Patents are an important tool for IBM to maintain its competitive advantage, she said, and are also a source of revenue through licensing.

Another advantage she emphasised was the flexibility that a large portfolio gives the company. Not only can IBM lessen the likelihood of accidental infringement, but it can also use its own patents to enter into cross-licensing agreements with other companies.

A broad portfolio ensures IBM’s freedom of action, so that it can manufacture what it wants and provide the services it wants, she said. “We don’t want to be restrained in our actions.”

The China – International IP Forum took place June 20 and 21 in Beijing.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article