ICANN offers gTLD refund

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ICANN offers gTLD refund

ICANN’s Board has decided to offer a full refund to any gTLD applicant that withdraws its application before the applied-for new strings are revealed.

The decision, made at the Board’s meeting in Amsterdam on Sunday, was in recognition of the inconvenience caused by the suspension of the TLD application system on April 12. The suspension was due to a software glitch that enabled some users to see file names belonging to others.

The system is not yet back online, but ICANN was expected to provide an update on timings late last night. It is believed to be contacting more than 100 users who were affected by the glitch.

The full refund means withdrawing applicants would receive about US$5,000 more than they would have otherwise.

ICANN’s Intellectual Property Constituency held a meeting yesterday in the Washington Convention Center, at which issues including new gTLDs, rights protection mechanisms, Whois developments and contract compliance were discussed. Also on the agenda was ICANN’s next meeting in Prague from June 24 to 29, at which the IPC has asked for a room to meet with new gTLD applicants. IPC members encouraged trademark owners to attend the Prague meeting either in person or via ICANN’s teleconference facilities, to make their views known.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
Gift this article