In a sign of the importance of intellectual property to the
European Commission, IP was the focus of the new internal market
commissioner's first speech to the European Parliament's legal
affairs committee last week.
The committee is the main decision-making body on changes to all
IP-related legal texts before they are presented for adoption by
the full Parliament.
Commissioner for the internal market Charlie McCreevy addressed
the committee on February 2 to help him form his opinion "on where
to go next". But his direct address also showed the Commission's
hopes of achieving progress on a number of IP draft laws to help
meet the Lisbon target of making the EU the most competitive
knowledge-based economy by 2010.
In particular, McCreevy raised the sticky issue of software
patents: "I appreciate that the directive on the patentability of
computer-implemented inventions is a very delicate issue and I
would not like to underestimate the hard work which will be needed
to ensure an agreement between Council and Parliament."
Since the Commission first proposed it in 2001, the draft legal
text has been the subject of a drawn-out battle between members of
the European Council and the Parliament, as well as pro- and anti-
software patent lobbies.
McCreevy said that the text, which has been held up in the
Council for almost a year, is due to be approved as an A-item at an
upcoming Council meeting. The text would then pass through
Parliament for a second reading and could be the subject of further
changes, or complete rejection.
"Needless to say, a constructive dialogue between the Council
and Parliament will be vital for an agreement," said McCreevy. "Any
agreement will need to strike a fair balance between different
interests. Having no directive means continuing to rely on case
law, which leads to considerable legal uncertainty which is why we
must strive to find a balanced solution."
McCreevy also addressed the Community patent, a sore point since
member states failed to reach unanimity on its scope in May 2004.
Without a single EU patent, said McCreevy, high costs and legal
uncertainty for IP owners, and less research and innovation would
remain key burdens in the internal market. "We continue to hope
that the Council will come to an agreement on the Community
patent," he stressed.
Touching on the Commission's proposed regulation on liberalizing
designs protection for spare parts, McCreevy warned that though IP
protection was important to boost innovation, "over-protection does
nothing to boost our competitiveness".
McCreevy's appointment had raised hopes in the IP community that
more progress could be made on harmonizing IP laws and practices
across the EU and that discussions on the Community patent could be
rekindled.
But as McCreevy said to the legal affairs committee: "It is
still early days in my mandate and I may not yet have answers to
all of your questions or comments."
To view the speech, click
here.
MIP Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story.
Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be
published online.